Feature/removal of monitor good nodes (#833)
* Removed separated ipv4 and ipv6 testing * Testing network using chosen core nodes This should have probably been like 20 independent commits... sorry... * SQL migrations for updated schema * SQL updates * Using absolute uptime directly * New uptime calculations * Config entries, more DB work, some cleanup * Additional API query routes * More SQL and API work * Changed `_` to `-` in new routes * Removed good topology from config * Fixed gateways reader yield condition * Initial gateways pinger * Minor cleanup and logging level decreases * Missing trait derivations * Further logging adjustments * Unused commented out import * Claiming additional bandwidth in coconut feature when low * Fixed build with coconut feature * Minimum number of test routes * Making beta/nightly clippy happier
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
parent
955ef7b871
commit
8bcc931d9b
@@ -5,100 +5,105 @@ use crate::node_status_api::models::Uptime;
|
||||
use crate::node_status_api::{FIFTEEN_MINUTES, ONE_HOUR};
|
||||
use crate::storage::models::NodeStatus;
|
||||
use log::warn;
|
||||
use std::cmp::min;
|
||||
use std::convert::TryInto;
|
||||
use time::OffsetDateTime;
|
||||
|
||||
// A temporary helper struct used to produce reports for active nodes.
|
||||
pub(crate) struct ActiveNodeDayStatuses {
|
||||
pub(crate) struct ActiveNodeStatuses {
|
||||
pub(crate) identity: String,
|
||||
pub(crate) owner: String,
|
||||
pub(crate) ipv4_statuses: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
pub(crate) ipv6_statuses: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
pub(crate) statuses: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A helper intermediate struct to remove duplicate code for construction of mixnode and gateway reports
|
||||
pub(crate) struct NodeUptimes {
|
||||
pub(crate) most_recent_ipv4: bool,
|
||||
pub(crate) most_recent_ipv6: bool,
|
||||
pub(crate) most_recent: Uptime,
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) last_hour_ipv4: Uptime,
|
||||
pub(crate) last_hour_ipv6: Uptime,
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) last_day_ipv4: Uptime,
|
||||
pub(crate) last_day_ipv6: Uptime,
|
||||
pub(crate) last_hour: Uptime,
|
||||
pub(crate) last_day: Uptime,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl NodeUptimes {
|
||||
pub(crate) fn calculate_from_last_day_reports(
|
||||
report_time: OffsetDateTime,
|
||||
last_day_ipv4: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
last_day_ipv6: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
last_day: Vec<NodeStatus>,
|
||||
last_hour_test_runs: usize,
|
||||
last_day_test_runs: usize,
|
||||
) -> Self {
|
||||
let hour_ago = (report_time - ONE_HOUR).unix_timestamp();
|
||||
let fifteen_minutes_ago = (report_time - FIFTEEN_MINUTES).unix_timestamp();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut ipv4_day_up = last_day_ipv4.iter().filter(|report| report.up).count();
|
||||
let mut ipv6_day_up = last_day_ipv6.iter().filter(|report| report.up).count();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut ipv4_hour_up = last_day_ipv4
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|report| report.up && report.timestamp >= hour_ago)
|
||||
.count();
|
||||
let mut ipv6_hour_up = last_day_ipv6
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|report| report.up && report.timestamp >= hour_ago)
|
||||
.count();
|
||||
|
||||
// most recent status MUST BE within last 15min
|
||||
let most_recent_ipv4 = last_day_ipv4
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.max_by_key(|report| report.timestamp) // find the most recent
|
||||
.map(|status| status.timestamp >= fifteen_minutes_ago && status.up) // make sure its within last 15min
|
||||
.unwrap_or_default();
|
||||
let most_recent_ipv6 = last_day_ipv6
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.max_by_key(|report| report.timestamp) // find the most recent
|
||||
.map(|status| status.timestamp >= fifteen_minutes_ago && status.up) // make sure its within last 15min
|
||||
.unwrap_or_default();
|
||||
|
||||
// If somehow we have more "up" reports than the actual test runs it means something weird is going on
|
||||
// If somehow we have more reports than the actual test runs it means something weird is going on
|
||||
// (or we just started running this code on old data, so if it appears for first 24h, it's fine and actually expected
|
||||
// as we would not have any run information from the past)
|
||||
// Either way, bound the the number of "up" reports by number of test runs and log warnings
|
||||
// if that happens
|
||||
if ipv4_hour_up > last_hour_test_runs || ipv6_hour_up > last_hour_test_runs {
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"We have more 'up' reports than the actual number of test runs in last hour! ({} ipv4 'ups', {} ipv6 'ups' for {} test runs)",
|
||||
ipv4_hour_up,
|
||||
ipv6_hour_up,
|
||||
last_hour_test_runs,
|
||||
);
|
||||
ipv4_hour_up = min(ipv4_hour_up, last_hour_test_runs);
|
||||
ipv6_hour_up = min(ipv6_hour_up, last_hour_test_runs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ipv4_day_up > last_day_test_runs || ipv6_day_up > last_day_test_runs {
|
||||
let last_day_sum: f32 = if last_day.len() > last_day_test_runs {
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"We have more 'up' reports than the actual number of test runs in last day! ({} ipv4 'ups', {} ipv6 'ups' for {} test runs)",
|
||||
ipv4_day_up,
|
||||
ipv6_day_up,
|
||||
"We have more reports than the actual number of test runs in last day! ({} reports for {} test runs)",
|
||||
last_day.len(),
|
||||
last_day_test_runs,
|
||||
);
|
||||
ipv4_day_up = min(ipv4_day_up, last_day_test_runs);
|
||||
ipv6_day_up = min(ipv6_day_up, last_day_test_runs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
last_day
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.take(last_day_test_runs)
|
||||
.map(|report| report.reliability as f32)
|
||||
.sum()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// we average over expected number of test runs so if a node was not online for some of them
|
||||
// it's treated as if it had a "zero" status.
|
||||
last_day
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|report| report.reliability as f32)
|
||||
.sum()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let last_hour_reports = last_day
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|report| report.timestamp >= hour_ago)
|
||||
.count();
|
||||
|
||||
let last_hour_sum: f32 = if last_hour_reports > last_hour_test_runs {
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"We have more reports than the actual number of test runs in last hour! ({} reports for {} test runs)",
|
||||
last_hour_reports,
|
||||
last_hour_test_runs,
|
||||
);
|
||||
last_day
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|report| report.timestamp >= hour_ago)
|
||||
.take(last_hour_test_runs)
|
||||
.map(|report| report.reliability as f32)
|
||||
.sum()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
last_day
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|report| report.timestamp >= hour_ago)
|
||||
.map(|report| report.reliability as f32)
|
||||
.sum()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// find the most recent
|
||||
let most_recent_report = last_day.iter().max_by_key(|report| report.timestamp);
|
||||
|
||||
let most_recent = if let Some(most_recent_report) = most_recent_report {
|
||||
// make sure its within last 15min
|
||||
if most_recent_report.timestamp >= fifteen_minutes_ago {
|
||||
most_recent_report.reliability
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
0
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
0
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// the unwraps in Uptime::from_ratio are fine because it's impossible for us to have more "up" results
|
||||
// than total test runs as we just bounded them
|
||||
NodeUptimes {
|
||||
most_recent_ipv4,
|
||||
most_recent_ipv6,
|
||||
last_hour_ipv4: Uptime::from_ratio(ipv4_hour_up, last_hour_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
last_hour_ipv6: Uptime::from_ratio(ipv6_hour_up, last_hour_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
last_day_ipv4: Uptime::from_ratio(ipv4_day_up, last_day_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
last_day_ipv6: Uptime::from_ratio(ipv6_day_up, last_day_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
most_recent: most_recent.try_into().unwrap(),
|
||||
last_hour: Uptime::from_uptime_sum(last_hour_sum, last_hour_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
last_day: Uptime::from_uptime_sum(last_day_sum, last_hour_test_runs).unwrap(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user