Files
nym/clients/client-core/src/client/received_buffer.rs
T
Jędrzej Stuczyński d95df4b286 Feature/implicit runtime (#973)
* Made mixnode runtime implicit

* Ibid for native and socks5 clients
2022-01-04 11:00:48 +00:00

363 lines
14 KiB
Rust

// Copyright 2021 - Nym Technologies SA <contact@nymtech.net>
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
use crate::client::reply_key_storage::ReplyKeyStorage;
use crypto::asymmetric::encryption;
use crypto::symmetric::stream_cipher;
use crypto::Digest;
use futures::channel::mpsc;
use futures::lock::Mutex;
use futures::StreamExt;
use gateway_client::MixnetMessageReceiver;
use log::*;
use nymsphinx::anonymous_replies::{encryption_key::EncryptionKeyDigest, SurbEncryptionKey};
use nymsphinx::params::{ReplySurbEncryptionAlgorithm, ReplySurbKeyDigestAlgorithm};
use nymsphinx::receiver::{MessageReceiver, MessageRecoveryError, ReconstructedMessage};
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::sync::Arc;
use tokio::task::JoinHandle;
// Buffer Requests to say "hey, send any reconstructed messages to this channel"
// or to say "hey, I'm going offline, don't send anything more to me. Just buffer them instead"
pub type ReceivedBufferRequestSender = mpsc::UnboundedSender<ReceivedBufferMessage>;
pub type ReceivedBufferRequestReceiver = mpsc::UnboundedReceiver<ReceivedBufferMessage>;
// The channel set for the above
pub type ReconstructedMessagesSender = mpsc::UnboundedSender<Vec<ReconstructedMessage>>;
pub type ReconstructedMessagesReceiver = mpsc::UnboundedReceiver<Vec<ReconstructedMessage>>;
struct ReceivedMessagesBufferInner {
messages: Vec<ReconstructedMessage>,
local_encryption_keypair: Arc<encryption::KeyPair>,
// TODO: looking how it 'looks' here, perhaps `MessageReceiver` should be renamed to something
// else instead.
message_receiver: MessageReceiver,
message_sender: Option<ReconstructedMessagesSender>,
// TODO: this will get cleared upon re-running the client
// but perhaps it should be changed to include timestamps of when the message was reconstructed
// and every now and then remove ids older than X
recently_reconstructed: HashSet<i32>,
}
impl ReceivedMessagesBufferInner {
fn process_received_fragment(&mut self, raw_fragment: Vec<u8>) -> Option<ReconstructedMessage> {
let fragment_data = match self
.message_receiver
.recover_plaintext(self.local_encryption_keypair.private_key(), raw_fragment)
{
Err(e) => {
warn!("failed to recover fragment data: {:?}. The whole underlying message might be corrupted and unrecoverable!", e);
return None;
}
Ok(frag_data) => frag_data,
};
if nymsphinx::cover::is_cover(&fragment_data) {
trace!("The message was a loop cover message! Skipping it");
return None;
}
let fragment = match self.message_receiver.recover_fragment(&fragment_data) {
Err(e) => {
warn!("failed to recover fragment from raw data: {:?}. The whole underlying message might be corrupted and unrecoverable!", e);
return None;
}
Ok(frag) => frag,
};
if self.recently_reconstructed.contains(&fragment.id()) {
debug!("Received a chunk of already re-assembled message ({:?})! It probably got here because the ack got lost", fragment.id());
return None;
}
// if we returned an error the underlying message is malformed in some way
match self.message_receiver.insert_new_fragment(fragment) {
Err(err) => match err {
MessageRecoveryError::MalformedReconstructedMessage(message_sets) => {
// TODO: should we really insert reconstructed sets? could this be abused for some attack?
for set_id in message_sets {
if !self.recently_reconstructed.insert(set_id) {
// or perhaps we should even panic at this point?
error!("Reconstructed another message containing already used set id!")
}
}
None
}
_ => unreachable!(
"no other error kind should have been returned here! If so, it's a bug!"
),
},
Ok(reconstruction_result) => match reconstruction_result {
Some((reconstructed_message, used_sets)) => {
for set_id in used_sets {
if !self.recently_reconstructed.insert(set_id) {
// or perhaps we should even panic at this point?
error!("Reconstructed another message containing already used set id!")
}
}
Some(reconstructed_message)
}
None => None,
},
}
}
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
// Note: you should NEVER create more than a single instance of this using 'new()'.
// You should always use .clone() to create additional instances
struct ReceivedMessagesBuffer {
inner: Arc<Mutex<ReceivedMessagesBufferInner>>,
/// Storage containing keys to all [`ReplySURB`]s ever sent out that we did not receive back.
// There's no need to put it behind a Mutex since it's already properly concurrent
reply_key_storage: ReplyKeyStorage,
}
impl ReceivedMessagesBuffer {
fn new(
local_encryption_keypair: Arc<encryption::KeyPair>,
reply_key_storage: ReplyKeyStorage,
) -> Self {
ReceivedMessagesBuffer {
inner: Arc::new(Mutex::new(ReceivedMessagesBufferInner {
messages: Vec::new(),
local_encryption_keypair,
message_receiver: MessageReceiver::new(),
message_sender: None,
recently_reconstructed: HashSet::new(),
})),
reply_key_storage,
}
}
async fn disconnect_sender(&mut self) {
let mut guard = self.inner.lock().await;
if guard.message_sender.is_none() {
// in theory we could just ignore it, but that situation should have never happened
// in the first place, so this way we at least know we have an important bug to fix
panic!("trying to disconnect non-existent sender!")
}
guard.message_sender = None;
}
async fn connect_sender(&mut self, sender: ReconstructedMessagesSender) {
let mut guard = self.inner.lock().await;
if guard.message_sender.is_some() {
// in theory we could just ignore it, but that situation should have never happened
// in the first place, so this way we at least know we have an important bug to fix
panic!("trying overwrite an existing sender!")
}
// while we're at it, also empty the buffer if we happened to receive anything while
// no sender was connected
let stored_messages = std::mem::take(&mut guard.messages);
if !stored_messages.is_empty() {
if let Err(err) = sender.unbounded_send(stored_messages) {
error!(
"The sender channel we just received is already invalidated - {:?}",
err
);
// put the values back to the buffer
// the returned error has two fields: err: SendError and val: T,
// where val is the value that was failed to get sent;
// it's returned by the `into_inner` call
guard.messages = err.into_inner();
return;
}
}
guard.message_sender = Some(sender);
}
async fn add_reconstructed_messages(&mut self, msgs: Vec<ReconstructedMessage>) {
debug!("Adding {:?} new messages to the buffer!", msgs.len());
trace!("Adding new messages to the buffer! {:?}", msgs);
self.inner.lock().await.messages.extend(msgs)
}
fn process_received_reply(
reply_ciphertext: &[u8],
reply_key: SurbEncryptionKey,
) -> Option<ReconstructedMessage> {
let zero_iv = stream_cipher::zero_iv::<ReplySurbEncryptionAlgorithm>();
let mut reply_msg = stream_cipher::decrypt::<ReplySurbEncryptionAlgorithm>(
reply_key.inner(),
&zero_iv,
reply_ciphertext,
);
if let Err(err) = MessageReceiver::remove_padding(&mut reply_msg) {
warn!("Received reply had malformed padding! - {:?}", err);
None
} else {
// TODO: perhaps having to say it doesn't have a surb an indication the type should be changed?
Some(ReconstructedMessage {
message: reply_msg,
reply_surb: None,
})
}
}
async fn handle_new_received(&mut self, msgs: Vec<Vec<u8>>) {
debug!(
"Processing {:?} new message that might get added to the buffer!",
msgs.len()
);
let mut completed_messages = Vec::new();
let mut inner_guard = self.inner.lock().await;
let reply_surb_digest_size = ReplySurbKeyDigestAlgorithm::output_size();
// first check if this is a reply or a chunked message
// TODO: verify with @AP if this way of doing it is safe or whether it could
// cause some attacks due to, I don't know, stupid edge case collisions?
// Update: this DOES introduce a possible leakage: https://github.com/nymtech/nym/issues/296
for msg in msgs {
let possible_key_digest =
EncryptionKeyDigest::clone_from_slice(&msg[..reply_surb_digest_size]);
// check first `HasherOutputSize` bytes if they correspond to known encryption key
// if yes - this is a reply message
// TODO: this might be a bottleneck - since the keys are stored on disk we, presumably,
// are doing a disk operation every single received fragment
if let Some(reply_encryption_key) = self
.reply_key_storage
.get_and_remove_encryption_key(possible_key_digest)
.expect("storage operation failed!")
{
if let Some(completed_message) = Self::process_received_reply(
&msg[reply_surb_digest_size..],
reply_encryption_key,
) {
completed_messages.push(completed_message)
}
} else {
// otherwise - it's a 'normal' message
if let Some(completed_message) = inner_guard.process_received_fragment(msg) {
completed_messages.push(completed_message)
}
}
}
if !completed_messages.is_empty() {
if let Some(sender) = &inner_guard.message_sender {
trace!("Sending reconstructed messages to announced sender");
if let Err(err) = sender.unbounded_send(completed_messages) {
warn!("The reconstructed message receiver went offline without explicit notification (relevant error: - {:?})", err);
// make sure to drop the lock to not deadlock
// (it is required by `add_reconstructed_messages`)
inner_guard.message_sender = None;
drop(inner_guard);
self.add_reconstructed_messages(err.into_inner()).await;
}
} else {
// make sure to drop the lock to not deadlock
// (it is required by `add_reconstructed_messages`)
drop(inner_guard);
trace!("No sender available - buffering reconstructed messages");
self.add_reconstructed_messages(completed_messages).await;
}
}
}
}
pub enum ReceivedBufferMessage {
// Signals a websocket connection (or a native implementation) was established and we should stop buffering messages,
// and instead send them directly to the received channel
ReceiverAnnounce(ReconstructedMessagesSender),
// Explicit signal that Receiver connection will no longer accept messages
ReceiverDisconnect,
}
struct RequestReceiver {
received_buffer: ReceivedMessagesBuffer,
query_receiver: ReceivedBufferRequestReceiver,
}
impl RequestReceiver {
fn new(
received_buffer: ReceivedMessagesBuffer,
query_receiver: ReceivedBufferRequestReceiver,
) -> Self {
RequestReceiver {
received_buffer,
query_receiver,
}
}
fn start(mut self) -> JoinHandle<()> {
tokio::spawn(async move {
while let Some(request) = self.query_receiver.next().await {
match request {
ReceivedBufferMessage::ReceiverAnnounce(sender) => {
self.received_buffer.connect_sender(sender).await;
}
ReceivedBufferMessage::ReceiverDisconnect => {
self.received_buffer.disconnect_sender().await
}
}
}
})
}
}
struct FragmentedMessageReceiver {
received_buffer: ReceivedMessagesBuffer,
mixnet_packet_receiver: MixnetMessageReceiver,
}
impl FragmentedMessageReceiver {
fn new(
received_buffer: ReceivedMessagesBuffer,
mixnet_packet_receiver: MixnetMessageReceiver,
) -> Self {
FragmentedMessageReceiver {
received_buffer,
mixnet_packet_receiver,
}
}
fn start(mut self) -> JoinHandle<()> {
tokio::spawn(async move {
while let Some(new_messages) = self.mixnet_packet_receiver.next().await {
self.received_buffer.handle_new_received(new_messages).await;
}
})
}
}
pub struct ReceivedMessagesBufferController {
fragmented_message_receiver: FragmentedMessageReceiver,
request_receiver: RequestReceiver,
}
impl ReceivedMessagesBufferController {
pub fn new(
local_encryption_keypair: Arc<encryption::KeyPair>,
query_receiver: ReceivedBufferRequestReceiver,
mixnet_packet_receiver: MixnetMessageReceiver,
reply_key_storage: ReplyKeyStorage,
) -> Self {
let received_buffer =
ReceivedMessagesBuffer::new(local_encryption_keypair, reply_key_storage);
ReceivedMessagesBufferController {
fragmented_message_receiver: FragmentedMessageReceiver::new(
received_buffer.clone(),
mixnet_packet_receiver,
),
request_receiver: RequestReceiver::new(received_buffer, query_receiver),
}
}
pub fn start(self) {
// TODO: should we do anything with JoinHandle(s) returned by start methods?
self.fragmented_message_receiver.start();
self.request_receiver.start();
}
}