Overide number of mix hops separately per packet (#4205)

* Try passing mix_hops all the way down the call chain

* Set zero mix_hops manually

* fix

* also set zero mix hops in tun listener

* fix

* mix hops for surbs

* Another case covered

* Remove mix_hops config from Traffic

* clippy

* Add comment about why we added new functions

* Update comment

* Add surb_mix_hops to wasm config

* Remove temporary added mix_hops = 0

* Remove another temporary added mix_hops = 0

* Add comment about the limitation of num_mix_hops
This commit is contained in:
Jon Häggblad
2023-12-05 16:09:15 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent 0f844aba38
commit a2219323d1
14 changed files with 140 additions and 13 deletions
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ pub enum InputMessage {
recipient: Recipient,
data: Vec<u8>,
lane: TransmissionLane,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
},
/// Creates a message used for a duplex anonymous communication where the recipient
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ pub enum InputMessage {
data: Vec<u8>,
reply_surbs: u32,
lane: TransmissionLane,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
},
/// Attempt to use our internally received and stored `ReplySurb` to send the message back
@@ -92,6 +94,29 @@ impl InputMessage {
recipient,
data,
lane,
mix_hops: None,
};
if let Some(packet_type) = packet_type {
InputMessage::new_wrapper(message, packet_type)
} else {
message
}
}
// IMHO `new_regular` should take `mix_hops: Option<u8>` as an argument instead of creating
// this function, but that would potentially break backwards compatibility with the current API
pub fn new_regular_with_custom_hops(
recipient: Recipient,
data: Vec<u8>,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: Option<PacketType>,
mix_hops: u8,
) -> Self {
let message = InputMessage::Regular {
recipient,
data,
lane,
mix_hops: Some(mix_hops),
};
if let Some(packet_type) = packet_type {
InputMessage::new_wrapper(message, packet_type)
@@ -112,6 +137,31 @@ impl InputMessage {
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
mix_hops: None,
};
if let Some(packet_type) = packet_type {
InputMessage::new_wrapper(message, packet_type)
} else {
message
}
}
// IMHO `new_anonymous` should take `mix_hops: Option<u8>` as an argument instead of creating
// this function, but that would potentially break backwards compatibility with the current API
pub fn new_anonymous_with_custom_hops(
recipient: Recipient,
data: Vec<u8>,
reply_surbs: u32,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: Option<PacketType>,
mix_hops: u8,
) -> Self {
let message = InputMessage::Anonymous {
recipient,
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
mix_hops: Some(mix_hops),
};
if let Some(packet_type) = packet_type {
InputMessage::new_wrapper(message, packet_type)
@@ -73,10 +73,11 @@ where
content: Vec<u8>,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) {
if let Err(err) = self
.message_handler
.try_send_plain_message(recipient, content, lane, packet_type)
.try_send_plain_message(recipient, content, lane, packet_type, mix_hops)
.await
{
warn!("failed to send a plain message - {err}")
@@ -90,10 +91,18 @@ where
reply_surbs: u32,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) {
if let Err(err) = self
.message_handler
.try_send_message_with_reply_surbs(recipient, content, reply_surbs, lane, packet_type)
.try_send_message_with_reply_surbs(
recipient,
content,
reply_surbs,
lane,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
.await
{
warn!("failed to send a repliable message - {err}")
@@ -106,8 +115,9 @@ where
recipient,
data,
lane,
mix_hops,
} => {
self.handle_plain_message(recipient, data, lane, PacketType::Mix)
self.handle_plain_message(recipient, data, lane, PacketType::Mix, mix_hops)
.await
}
InputMessage::Anonymous {
@@ -115,9 +125,17 @@ where
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
mix_hops,
} => {
self.handle_repliable_message(recipient, data, reply_surbs, lane, PacketType::Mix)
.await
self.handle_repliable_message(
recipient,
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
PacketType::Mix,
mix_hops,
)
.await
}
InputMessage::Reply {
recipient_tag,
@@ -135,8 +153,9 @@ where
recipient,
data,
lane,
mix_hops,
} => {
self.handle_plain_message(recipient, data, lane, packet_type)
self.handle_plain_message(recipient, data, lane, packet_type, mix_hops)
.await
}
InputMessage::Anonymous {
@@ -144,9 +163,17 @@ where
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
mix_hops,
} => {
self.handle_repliable_message(recipient, data, reply_surbs, lane, packet_type)
.await
self.handle_repliable_message(
recipient,
data,
reply_surbs,
lane,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
.await
}
InputMessage::Reply {
recipient_tag,
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ pub(crate) struct PendingAcknowledgement {
message_chunk: Fragment,
delay: SphinxDelay,
destination: PacketDestination,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
}
impl PendingAcknowledgement {
@@ -77,11 +78,13 @@ impl PendingAcknowledgement {
message_chunk: Fragment,
delay: SphinxDelay,
recipient: Recipient,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Self {
PendingAcknowledgement {
message_chunk,
delay,
destination: PacketDestination::KnownRecipient(recipient.into()),
mix_hops,
}
}
@@ -98,6 +101,9 @@ impl PendingAcknowledgement {
recipient_tag,
extra_surb_request,
},
// Messages sent using SURBs are using the number of mix hops set by the recipient when
// they provided the SURBs, so it doesn't make sense to include it here.
mix_hops: None,
}
}
@@ -49,12 +49,18 @@ where
packet_recipient: Recipient,
chunk_data: Fragment,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<PreparedFragment, PreparationError> {
debug!("retransmitting normal packet...");
// TODO: Figure out retransmission packet type signaling
self.message_handler
.try_prepare_single_chunk_for_sending(packet_recipient, chunk_data, packet_type)
.try_prepare_single_chunk_for_sending(
packet_recipient,
chunk_data,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
.await
}
@@ -89,6 +95,7 @@ where
**recipient,
timed_out_ack.message_chunk.clone(),
packet_type,
timed_out_ack.mix_hops,
)
.await
}
@@ -418,9 +418,10 @@ where
message: Vec<u8>,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<(), PreparationError> {
let message = NymMessage::new_plain(message);
self.try_split_and_send_non_reply_message(message, recipient, lane, packet_type)
self.try_split_and_send_non_reply_message(message, recipient, lane, packet_type, mix_hops)
.await
}
@@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ where
recipient: Recipient,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<(), PreparationError> {
debug!("Sending non-reply message with packet type {packet_type}");
// TODO: I really dislike existence of this assertion, it implies code has to be re-organised
@@ -461,6 +463,7 @@ where
&self.config.ack_key,
&recipient,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)?;
let real_message = RealMessage::new(
@@ -468,7 +471,8 @@ where
Some(fragment.fragment_identifier()),
);
let delay = prepared_fragment.total_delay;
let pending_ack = PendingAcknowledgement::new_known(fragment, delay, recipient);
let pending_ack =
PendingAcknowledgement::new_known(fragment, delay, recipient, mix_hops);
real_messages.push(real_message);
pending_acks.push(pending_ack);
@@ -485,6 +489,7 @@ where
recipient: Recipient,
amount: u32,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<(), PreparationError> {
debug!("Sending additional reply SURBs with packet type {packet_type}");
let sender_tag = self.get_or_create_sender_tag(&recipient);
@@ -501,6 +506,7 @@ where
recipient,
TransmissionLane::AdditionalReplySurbs,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
.await?;
@@ -517,6 +523,7 @@ where
num_reply_surbs: u32,
lane: TransmissionLane,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<(), SurbWrappedPreparationError> {
debug!("Sending message with reply SURBs with packet type {packet_type}");
let sender_tag = self.get_or_create_sender_tag(&recipient);
@@ -527,7 +534,7 @@ where
let message =
NymMessage::new_repliable(RepliableMessage::new_data(message, sender_tag, reply_surbs));
self.try_split_and_send_non_reply_message(message, recipient, lane, packet_type)
self.try_split_and_send_non_reply_message(message, recipient, lane, packet_type, mix_hops)
.await?;
log::trace!("storing {} reply keys", reply_keys.len());
@@ -541,6 +548,7 @@ where
recipient: Recipient,
chunk: Fragment,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<PreparedFragment, PreparationError> {
debug!("Sending single chunk with packet type {packet_type}");
let topology_permit = self.topology_access.get_read_permit().await;
@@ -554,6 +562,7 @@ where
&self.config.ack_key,
&recipient,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
.unwrap();
@@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ where
recipient,
to_send,
nym_sphinx::params::PacketType::Mix,
self.config.reply_surbs.surb_mix_hops,
)
.await
{
+5
View File
@@ -607,6 +607,10 @@ pub struct ReplySurbs {
/// This is going to be superseded by key rotation once implemented.
#[serde(with = "humantime_serde")]
pub maximum_reply_key_age: Duration,
/// Specifies the number of mixnet hops the packet should go through. If not specified, then
/// the default value is used.
pub surb_mix_hops: Option<u8>,
}
impl Default for ReplySurbs {
@@ -622,6 +626,7 @@ impl Default for ReplySurbs {
maximum_reply_surb_drop_waiting_period: DEFAULT_MAXIMUM_REPLY_SURB_DROP_WAITING_PERIOD,
maximum_reply_surb_age: DEFAULT_MAXIMUM_REPLY_SURB_AGE,
maximum_reply_key_age: DEFAULT_MAXIMUM_REPLY_KEY_AGE,
surb_mix_hops: None,
}
}
}
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ impl From<ConfigV1_1_30> for Config {
.maximum_reply_surb_drop_waiting_period,
maximum_reply_surb_age: value.debug.reply_surbs.maximum_reply_surb_age,
maximum_reply_key_age: value.debug.reply_surbs.maximum_reply_key_age,
surb_mix_hops: None,
},
},
}
+1
View File
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ where
&address,
&address,
PacketType::Mix,
None,
)?)
}
+6 -1
View File
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ pub trait FragmentPreparer {
/// - compute vk_b = g^x || v_b
/// - compute sphinx_plaintext = SURB_ACK || g^x || v_b
/// - compute sphinx_packet = Sphinx(recipient, sphinx_plaintext)
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
fn prepare_chunk_for_sending(
&mut self,
fragment: Fragment,
@@ -189,6 +190,7 @@ pub trait FragmentPreparer {
packet_sender: &Recipient,
packet_recipient: &Recipient,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<PreparedFragment, NymTopologyError> {
// each plain or repliable packet (i.e. not a reply) attaches an ephemeral public key so that the recipient
// could perform diffie-hellman with its own keys followed by a kdf to re-derive
@@ -226,7 +228,8 @@ pub trait FragmentPreparer {
};
// generate pseudorandom route for the packet
let hops = self.num_mix_hops();
let hops = mix_hops.unwrap_or(self.num_mix_hops());
log::trace!("Preparing chunk for sending with {} mix hops", hops);
let route =
topology.random_route_to_gateway(self.rng(), hops, packet_recipient.gateway())?;
let destination = packet_recipient.as_sphinx_destination();
@@ -389,6 +392,7 @@ where
ack_key: &AckKey,
packet_recipient: &Recipient,
packet_type: PacketType,
mix_hops: Option<u8>,
) -> Result<PreparedFragment, NymTopologyError> {
let sender = self.sender_address;
@@ -400,6 +404,7 @@ where
&sender,
packet_recipient,
packet_type,
mix_hops,
)
}
+4
View File
@@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ pub struct SphinxMessageReceiver {
impl SphinxMessageReceiver {
/// Allows setting non-default number of expected mix hops in the network.
// IMPORTANT NOTE: this is among others used to deserialize SURBs. Meaning that this is a
// global setting and currently always set to the default value. The implication is that it is
// not currently possible to have different number of hops for different SURB messages. So,
// don't try to use <3 mix hops for SURBs until this is refactored.
#[must_use]
pub fn with_mix_hops(mut self, hops: u8) -> Self {
self.num_mix_hops = hops;
@@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ pub struct ReplySurbsWasm {
/// Defines maximum amount of time given reply key is going to be valid for.
/// This is going to be superseded by key rotation once implemented.
pub maximum_reply_key_age_ms: u32,
/// Defines how many mix nodes the reply surb should go through.
/// If not set, the default value is going to be used.
pub surb_mix_hops: Option<u8>,
}
impl Default for ReplySurbsWasm {
@@ -463,6 +467,7 @@ impl From<ReplySurbsWasm> for ConfigReplySurbs {
maximum_reply_key_age: Duration::from_millis(
reply_surbs.maximum_reply_key_age_ms as u64,
),
surb_mix_hops: reply_surbs.surb_mix_hops,
}
}
}
@@ -484,6 +489,7 @@ impl From<ConfigReplySurbs> for ReplySurbsWasm {
.as_millis() as u32,
maximum_reply_surb_age_ms: reply_surbs.maximum_reply_surb_age.as_millis() as u32,
maximum_reply_key_age_ms: reply_surbs.maximum_reply_key_age.as_millis() as u32,
surb_mix_hops: reply_surbs.surb_mix_hops,
}
}
}
@@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ pub struct ReplySurbsWasmOverride {
/// This is going to be superseded by key rotation once implemented.
#[tsify(optional)]
pub maximum_reply_key_age_ms: Option<u32>,
#[tsify(optional)]
pub surb_mix_hops: Option<u8>,
}
impl From<ReplySurbsWasmOverride> for ReplySurbsWasm {
@@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ impl From<ReplySurbsWasmOverride> for ReplySurbsWasm {
maximum_reply_key_age_ms: value
.maximum_reply_key_age_ms
.unwrap_or(def.maximum_reply_key_age_ms),
surb_mix_hops: value.surb_mix_hops,
}
}
}
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ impl MixnetAddress {
recipient: *recipient,
data: message,
lane: TransmissionLane::ConnectionId(connection_id),
mix_hops: None,
}),
packet_type,
},