Bugfix/send to correct gateway (#213)

* Initial multiple gateway support

* Hello random cargo fmt

clients/desktop/src/client/mod.rs

@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ impl NymClient {
 
     async fn get_gateway_address<T: NymTopology>(
         gateway_id: String,
-        mut topology_accessor: TopologyAccessor<T>,
+        topology_accessor: TopologyAccessor<T>,
     ) -> url::Url {
         // we already have our gateway written in the config
         let gateway_address = topology_accessor

clients/desktop/src/client/real_traffic_stream.rs

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ use futures::channel::mpsc;
 use futures::task::{Context, Poll};
 use futures::{Future, Stream, StreamExt};
 use log::{error, info, trace, warn};
-use nymsphinx::Destination;
+use nymsphinx::{Destination, DestinationAddressBytes};
 use std::pin::Pin;
 use std::time::Duration;
 use tokio::runtime::Handle;
@@ -96,31 +96,48 @@ impl<T: 'static + NymTopology> OutQueueControl<T> {
         }
     }
 
-    async fn on_message(&mut self, next_message: StreamMessage) {
-        trace!("created new message");
-        let route = match self.topology_access.random_route().await {
-            None => {
-                warn!("No valid topology detected - won't send any real or loop message this time");
-                // TODO: this creates a potential problem: we can lose real messages if we were
-                // unable to get topology, perhaps we should store them in some buffer?
-                return;
-            }
-            Some(route) => route,
+    async fn get_route(
+        &self,
+        client: Option<DestinationAddressBytes>,
+    ) -> Option<Vec<nymsphinx::Node>> {
+        let route = match client {
+            None => self.topology_access.random_route().await,
+            Some(client) => self.topology_access.random_route_to_client(client).await,
         };
 
+        route
+    }
+
+    async fn on_message(&mut self, next_message: StreamMessage) {
+        trace!("created new message");
+
         let next_packet = match next_message {
-            StreamMessage::Cover => mix_client::packet::loop_cover_message_route(
-                self.our_info.address.clone(),
-                self.our_info.identifier,
-                route,
-                self.average_packet_delay,
-            ),
-            StreamMessage::Real(real_message) => mix_client::packet::encapsulate_message_route(
-                real_message.0,
-                real_message.1,
-                route,
-                self.average_packet_delay,
-            ),
+            StreamMessage::Cover => {
+                let route = self.get_route(None).await;
+                if route.is_none() {
+                    warn!("No valid topology detected - won't send any real or loop message this time");
+                }
+                let route = route.unwrap();
+                mix_client::packet::loop_cover_message_route(
+                    self.our_info.address.clone(),
+                    self.our_info.identifier,
+                    route,
+                    self.average_packet_delay,
+                )
+            }
+            StreamMessage::Real(real_message) => {
+                let route = self.get_route(Some(real_message.0.address.clone())).await;
+                if route.is_none() {
+                    warn!("No valid topology detected - won't send any real or loop message this time");
+                }
+                let route = route.unwrap();
+                mix_client::packet::encapsulate_message_route(
+                    real_message.0,
+                    real_message.1,
+                    route,
+                    self.average_packet_delay,
+                )
+            }
         };
 
         let next_packet = match next_packet {
@@ -143,6 +160,9 @@ impl<T: 'static + NymTopology> OutQueueControl<T> {
             .unwrap();
         // JS: Not entirely sure why or how it fixes stuff, but without the yield call,
         // the UnboundedReceiver [of mix_rx] will not get a chance to read anything
+        // JS2: Basically it was the case that with high enough rate, the stream had already a next value
+        // ready and hence was immediately re-scheduled causing other tasks to be starved;
+        // yield makes it go back the scheduling queue regardless of its value availability
         tokio::task::yield_now().await;
     }
 

clients/desktop/src/client/topology_control.rs

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ use crypto::identity::MixIdentityKeyPair;
 use futures::lock::Mutex;
 use healthcheck::HealthChecker;
 use log::*;
+use nymsphinx::DestinationAddressBytes;
 use std::sync::Arc;
 use std::time;
 use std::time::Duration;
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ impl<T: NymTopology> TopologyAccessor<T> {
     }
 
     // not removed until healtchecker is not fully changed to use gateways instead of providers
-    pub(crate) async fn get_provider_socket_addr(&mut self, id: &str) -> Option<SocketAddr> {
+    pub(crate) async fn get_provider_socket_addr(&self, id: &str) -> Option<SocketAddr> {
         match &self.inner.lock().await.0 {
             None => None,
             Some(ref topology) => topology
@@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ impl<T: NymTopology> TopologyAccessor<T> {
         }
     }
 
-    pub(crate) async fn get_gateway_socket_url(&mut self, id: &str) -> Option<String> {
+    pub(crate) async fn get_gateway_socket_url(&self, id: &str) -> Option<String> {
         match &self.inner.lock().await.0 {
             None => None,
             Some(ref topology) => topology
@@ -89,11 +90,11 @@ impl<T: NymTopology> TopologyAccessor<T> {
     }
 
     // Unless you absolutely need the entire topology, use `random_route` instead
-    pub(crate) async fn get_current_topology_clone(&mut self) -> Option<T> {
+    pub(crate) async fn get_current_topology_clone(&self) -> Option<T> {
         self.inner.lock().await.0.clone()
     }
 
-    pub(crate) async fn get_all_clients(&mut self) -> Option<Vec<provider::Client>> {
+    pub(crate) async fn get_all_clients(&self) -> Option<Vec<provider::Client>> {
         // TODO: this will need to be modified to instead return pairs (provider, client)
         match &self.inner.lock().await.0 {
             None => None,
@@ -108,9 +109,26 @@ impl<T: NymTopology> TopologyAccessor<T> {
         }
     }
 
+    pub(crate) async fn random_route_to_client(
+        &self,
+        client_address: DestinationAddressBytes,
+    ) -> Option<Vec<nymsphinx::Node>> {
+        let b58_address = client_address.to_base58_string();
+        let guard = self.inner.lock().await;
+        let topology = guard.0.as_ref()?;
+
+        let gateway = topology
+            .gateways()
+            .iter()
+            .cloned()
+            .find(|gateway| gateway.has_client(b58_address.clone()))?;
+
+        topology.random_route_to(gateway.into()).ok()
+    }
+
     // this is a rather temporary solution as each client will have an associated provider
     // currently that is not implemented yet and there only exists one provider in the network
-    pub(crate) async fn random_route(&mut self) -> Option<Vec<nymsphinx::Node>> {
+    pub(crate) async fn random_route(&self) -> Option<Vec<nymsphinx::Node>> {
         match &self.inner.lock().await.0 {
             None => None,
             Some(ref topology) => {
@@ -120,7 +138,7 @@ impl<T: NymTopology> TopologyAccessor<T> {
                 }
                 // unwrap is fine here as we asserted there is at least single provider
                 let provider = gateways.pop().unwrap().into();
-                topology.route_to(provider).ok()
+                topology.random_route_to(provider).ok()
             }
         }
     }

common/client-libs/mix-client/src/packet.rs

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ pub fn encapsulate_message<T: NymTopology>(
     // unwrap is fine here as we asserted there is at least single provider
     let provider = providers.pop().unwrap().into();
 
-    let route = topology.route_to(provider)?;
+    let route = topology.random_route_to(provider)?;
 
     let delays = delays::generate_from_average_duration(route.len(), average_delay);
 

common/topology/src/gateway.rs

@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ impl Node {
         bs58::decode(&self.pub_key).into(&mut key_bytes).unwrap();
         key_bytes
     }
+
+    pub fn has_client(&self, client_pub_key: String) -> bool {
+        self.registered_clients
+            .iter()
+            .find(|client| client.pub_key == client_pub_key)
+            .is_some()
+    }
 }
 
 impl filter::Versioned for Node {

common/topology/src/lib.rs

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ pub trait NymTopology: Sized + std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + Clone {
     }
 
     // Tries to get a route through the mix network
-    fn mix_route(&self) -> Result<Vec<SphinxNode>, NymTopologyError> {
+    fn random_mix_route(&self) -> Result<Vec<SphinxNode>, NymTopologyError> {
         let mut layered_topology = self.make_layered_topology()?;
         let num_layers = layered_topology.len();
         let route = (1..=num_layers as u64)
@@ -87,9 +87,12 @@ pub trait NymTopology: Sized + std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + Clone {
     }
 
     // Sets up a route to a specific provider
-    fn route_to(&self, provider_node: SphinxNode) -> Result<Vec<SphinxNode>, NymTopologyError> {
+    fn random_route_to(
+        &self,
+        provider_node: SphinxNode,
+    ) -> Result<Vec<SphinxNode>, NymTopologyError> {
         Ok(self
-            .mix_route()?
+            .random_mix_route()?
             .into_iter()
             .chain(std::iter::once(provider_node))
             .collect())